At the risk of opening up a can of worms, I'd like to dabble a bit in some issues relating to the New Perspective on Paul.
As a disclaimer, the fact that I am an alumnus of Westminster Seminary California will probably open me up to the charge of being a bloodthirsty "heresy hunter" (as many critics of NPP are characterized), so I will do my best to keep the conversation civil.
My first proposition is as follows:
In its ordinary usage in Scripture, "righteousness" is a moral concept referring to what one has as a result of doing the good that the law requires.
Am I misdefining the term? Am I failing to do justice to its ecclesiastical or covenantal aspects? Have my Greek, forensic categories clouded my ability to appreciate the familial, loving, Hebrew context of this word's origin?
Fire away (but be gentle)....
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|